<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artwork of The Da Vinci Code: Virgin of the Rocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:11:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-13286</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-13286</guid>
		<description>QUOTE: &quot;All of yall are stupid&quot;

To: Eric

I really enjoyed you choice of words and can clearly say: I have never seen &quot;All&quot; and &quot;Y&#039;all&quot; in the same sentance.

Just remarkable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE: &#8220;All of yall are stupid&#8221;</p>
<p>To: Eric</p>
<p>I really enjoyed you choice of words and can clearly say: I have never seen &#8220;All&#8221; and &#8220;Y&#8217;all&#8221; in the same sentance.</p>
<p>Just remarkable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LETICIA</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-13283</link>
		<dc:creator>LETICIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-13283</guid>
		<description>regardless whether it was right or not ...it was a great book...and i think when david said that the descriptions of the painting were accurate he ment the painting itself not what is what painted on or with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regardless whether it was right or not &#8230;it was a great book&#8230;and i think when david said that the descriptions of the painting were accurate he ment the painting itself not what is what painted on or with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-13243</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-13243</guid>
		<description>I am looking at my art book, I am a college freshman and am very much into this whole Jesus had a wife thing. Both Serena and David are right... my book says &quot;Leonardo Da Vinci, Madonna on the Rocks, 1483-85. Oil on wood, TRANSFERRED to canvas..&quot; That is the second one Da Vinci  painted. But I was wondering, as I&#039;m looking at the original from my book, isn&#039;t the baby on the right John the Baptist along with his mother Elizabeth? And if thats the case it&#039;s not Jesus&#039; apostle but his cousin and his aunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking at my art book, I am a college freshman and am very much into this whole Jesus had a wife thing. Both Serena and David are right&#8230; my book says &#8220;Leonardo Da Vinci, Madonna on the Rocks, 1483-85. Oil on wood, TRANSFERRED to canvas..&#8221; That is the second one Da Vinci  painted. But I was wondering, as I&#8217;m looking at the original from my book, isn&#8217;t the baby on the right John the Baptist along with his mother Elizabeth? And if thats the case it&#8217;s not Jesus&#8217; apostle but his cousin and his aunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-13145</link>
		<dc:creator>jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-13145</guid>
		<description>A common man like Da Vinci cannot honestly be expected to have thought the outrageous thoughts put out by TDVC whilst painting his stunning artworks. While it was a great read, I beg you all to remember fiction is simply that. During recent court case it was made clear that Brown (and his wife) were out to write a novel based around art works that exist today for an added realistic aspect. This is the hook- we know the artwork and that keeps us intrigued- how they all link together to provide the clues needed to solve the chase is why people found the book so good. Leonardo was a genius and ahead of his time, but the theories Brown puts foward are conspiriacies and he readily admits that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common man like Da Vinci cannot honestly be expected to have thought the outrageous thoughts put out by TDVC whilst painting his stunning artworks. While it was a great read, I beg you all to remember fiction is simply that. During recent court case it was made clear that Brown (and his wife) were out to write a novel based around art works that exist today for an added realistic aspect. This is the hook- we know the artwork and that keeps us intrigued- how they all link together to provide the clues needed to solve the chase is why people found the book so good. Leonardo was a genius and ahead of his time, but the theories Brown puts foward are conspiriacies and he readily admits that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-12779</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-12779</guid>
		<description>While I do believe that Leonardo Da Vince was a genius, I don&#039;t believe in everthing he said &quot;decoded or not&quot;. Leonardo just like everyone of us was a MAN. How can anyone say that HE is not the one pulling a hoax? Afterall, it&#039;s not like he was present at the &quot;Last Supper&quot; telling all parties to: &quot;Please, smile and stay still&quot; while he paints their portrait. What we have is the &quot;word&quot; of a common man, genuis, famous painter... but also a bitter person that really didn&#039;t like how things were at the time and in the end known as a prankster. Basically, I take this information, for what it&#039;s worth... just informational input. When the time comes, and the Lord is willling, I will know what&#039;s meant for me to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do believe that Leonardo Da Vince was a genius, I don&#8217;t believe in everthing he said &#8220;decoded or not&#8221;. Leonardo just like everyone of us was a MAN. How can anyone say that HE is not the one pulling a hoax? Afterall, it&#8217;s not like he was present at the &#8220;Last Supper&#8221; telling all parties to: &#8220;Please, smile and stay still&#8221; while he paints their portrait. What we have is the &#8220;word&#8221; of a common man, genuis, famous painter&#8230; but also a bitter person that really didn&#8217;t like how things were at the time and in the end known as a prankster. Basically, I take this information, for what it&#8217;s worth&#8230; just informational input. When the time comes, and the Lord is willling, I will know what&#8217;s meant for me to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmzee</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-12769</link>
		<dc:creator>emmzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-12769</guid>
		<description>victor, your comment is interesting. When you say you \&quot;belive each word came in the DVC, coz it built on logical conclusions\&quot;, do you mean you believe everything that Brown writes in his novel? If so, perhaps reading these articles might be beneficial:

http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/23/did-leonardo-da-vinci-hate-the-bible/
http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/20/podcast-opus-dei-and-the-priory-of-sion/
http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/26/how-many-gospels/
http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/29/was-jesus-considered-merely-a-man/

If an argument is based on a firm foundation, then it may be viable, but if it is based on sloppy research and misrepresenting history, then it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>victor, your comment is interesting. When you say you \&#8221;belive each word came in the DVC, coz it built on logical conclusions\&#8221;, do you mean you believe everything that Brown writes in his novel? If so, perhaps reading these articles might be beneficial:</p>
<p><a href="http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/23/did-leonardo-da-vinci-hate-the-bible/" rel="nofollow">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/23/did-leonardo-da-vinci-hate-the-bible/</a><br />
<a href="http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/20/podcast-opus-dei-and-the-priory-of-sion/" rel="nofollow">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/20/podcast-opus-dei-and-the-priory-of-sion/</a><br />
<a href="http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/26/how-many-gospels/" rel="nofollow">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/26/how-many-gospels/</a><br />
<a href="http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/29/was-jesus-considered-merely-a-man/" rel="nofollow">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/05/29/was-jesus-considered-merely-a-man/</a></p>
<p>If an argument is based on a firm foundation, then it may be viable, but if it is based on sloppy research and misrepresenting history, then it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-12766</link>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-12766</guid>
		<description>i do agree with david and belive each word came in the DVC, coz it built on logical conclusions.Davinci was realy genious.the history would change if we could understand correctly the davinci art by way that we remove all our experience  moment when we look at the paints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do agree with david and belive each word came in the DVC, coz it built on logical conclusions.Davinci was realy genious.the history would change if we could understand correctly the davinci art by way that we remove all our experience  moment when we look at the paints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haramin</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-12705</link>
		<dc:creator>Haramin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-12705</guid>
		<description>David is right Serena, while similar, the Madonna and Virgin of the rocks are easy to mix up. TDVC was actually factually correct about the art. The dimensions he mentions are correct too, I rememebr being taller than the painting while looking at it, and I am definetely not 6.5ft!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David is right Serena, while similar, the Madonna and Virgin of the rocks are easy to mix up. TDVC was actually factually correct about the art. The dimensions he mentions are correct too, I rememebr being taller than the painting while looking at it, and I am definetely not 6.5ft!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-12673</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-12673</guid>
		<description>Mark,
It sounds like you are one of the many that will not accecpt what they refuse to understand. Clearly you have no business in here discussing FACTS from FICTION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
It sounds like you are one of the many that will not accecpt what they refuse to understand. Clearly you have no business in here discussing FACTS from FICTION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://powertochange.com/blogposts/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-12671</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davinci.thelife.com/2006/04/23/artwork-of-the-da-vinci-code-virgin-of-the-rocks/#comment-12671</guid>
		<description>to mark..... if you couldnt care less why are you reading this??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to mark&#8230;.. if you couldnt care less why are you reading this??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

