You say that these are not errors, but “his own interpretation” and that I “feel Dan Brown was wrong”. But I don’t “feel” that he was wrong, I demonstrated it. As per the introduction to his book, “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.” Since it’s demonstrated above that he has totally misrepresented Leonardo Da Vinci’s work, this violates his own statement at the beginning of this book.

“You cannot deny that Mary Magdalene had her own gospels or that in other gospels ( which were taken out by the church) said she was a high figure.”

I do actually deny that Mary Magdalene “had her own gospels” if you mean documents written by herself. We do have writings which focus more on Mary, but these were written 80, 100, or more years after the gospels we find in the New Testament, so there’s no reason to trust them instead of the ones in the New Testament.

I also disagree that these were “taken out by the church”. They couldn’t have been taken out because they were never “in” the Bible. If you mean that they were somehow repressed by the church, we don’t (as far as I know) have any evidence of any kind of organized oppression of documents.

For anyone who’s interested in this subject there’s a good video on the subject here.
http://www.leestrobel.com/videoserver/video.php?clip=strobelT1090

Some stuff to think about, anyways. :)