Ways To Give

The Da Vinci Code: Whose Code Is It?

Written by Chris Shipley

It seems like everywhere you turn someone is reading, has read, or plans to read Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code. There is something exhilarating about discovering something that was hidden. An inside look, a covert meaning, a new voice testifying to supposedly new facts– the plot thickens.

So why is this style of writing so tantalizing?  What makes books like Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code so hard to put down?  Why does a good investigative fiction cause us to forfeit food, hygiene and possibly our daily responsibilities before we finish the book?

One reason for the interest is due to the nature of conspiracy theories. We finally find someone (the author or a main character in this case) who is asking questions similar to the questions we have been asking. In the world of fiction it is possible to find answers to perplexing questions, or at least some promising leads.  A good author writes of things that we all think about or wonder about from time to time. Is this true?  What if this happened?  From these few truths and a fertile seedbed of doubt. The author can creatively build a complex plot.  There is just enough truth contained in the story to whet the palate. The rest is sugar and spice.  And there’s lots of sugar on every page to make the book hard to put down.  So we keep turning the pages.  It makes for great fiction, a bestseller.

But how do we know when the author is giving us real food or just sugar water? Out of everything he writes, which is the fact and which is the fiction?

As we all know, good investigative fiction weaves in just enough truth to make it believable – as though it spoke of things as they actually were.  If it’s too far-fetched, we call such writing science fiction.  On the other hand, it can’t be the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  It would then be called a documentary.  Having laid a credible plot that the reader will accept as plausible, the author soars creatively into the realm of conspiracy, weaving together an enticing mixture of fact and fiction.

But when I finally put the book down, do I actually believe that Sherlock Homes existed or that the events of The Pelican Brief truly occurred? Shouldn’t we be just as investigative as the investigator in the fiction we just read?  I’ve always heard that imitation is the greatest compliment.

In other words, someone tells us a story. We are intrigued and want to learn more.  We go and look to see if what the author has told us is true or not.  It becomes a kind of a game to try to figure out which parts of the story came from the real world and which parts came from the author’s imagination.  We do some investigation of our own.  We look under a few rocks and  try to crack the code as to what is fact and what is fiction.

Sometimes, we don’t have to look too far to realize a story isn’t real.  I don’t have to visit the Mines of Moria from the Lord of the Rings to know if they exist.  We know they don’t (I hope).  Other stories might take a little more effort to figure out.

Which takes us back to Dan Brown.  His The Da Vinci Code is a thrilling page-turner.  It has become a bestseller.  In such a masterfully crafted story it can be difficult to discern where the fiction lies within this fiction.  Are all the rocks being overturned?  Is Dan Brown relating all the facts, or just the ones he needs to in order to put together a bestseller?  For instance, can we know whether the Bible is reliable, if the paintings in the Louvre are described accurately, or whether parchments identifying the Priory of Sion really exist?  How do we investigate these questions?  How do we crack the code – Dan Brown’s code that is?

The Da Vinci Code is certainly a good read. It comes highly recommended. Doing some of your own research into the author’s research is another recommendation worth the effort.

One Response to “The Da Vinci Code: Whose Code Is It?”

• Loading comments
• samuel says:

  May 28, 2009 at 2:36 am

  well.. Chris Shipley..your surely know your way around books..am impressed at your deductive skills..i personally have watched TV shows like CSI..n am amazed at how they take elaborate steps to come to the truth..or at least to understand the nature of the crime..anyone who has read a good detective story can come to the conclusion that in any scenario..there are two possible outcomes..first,where one clue leads to another one one is able to come to a possible outcome..the other is where the clues don’t add up n one is left going round in circles..what am getting at is that..a good detective story does not always have to have a possible outcome..this is why people enjoy a good suspense novel or movie..a good author wants his audience to make up the conclusion of the story..this is why book sellers like Steven King always have one best seller after another..thus..they ensure a loyal following and movie titles of their books..since man was given an analytical mind..he is bound to want to make discoveries and explore the limits of his intellect.. this is how all the great discoverers of our time like Leonardo Davinci came to be famous..funny how a harmless portrait like The Monalisa can spark such controversy..i believe this is why the Davinci Code has become such great success to warrant its sequel Angel n Demon, acted still by Tom Hanks..Scripture says that Satan presented the fruit of good n evil.. verse 6 of Genesis 3 says, “when the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food n pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom,she took some and ate it. she also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate.” verse 7 continues to say, “then the eyes of both of them were opened, n they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves” realizing the danger that such ‘wisdom ‘ has in store for those curious enough to taste of the fruit of the tree..the wise Paul warned us to avoid all manner of controversy..reason..just like the fruit fruit appealed to eve..both for nourishment as well as for knowledge.. the end result was that both man n wife found themselves naked and embarrassed at the sight of each other..this is what controversial stories do to our minds..slowly but surely we are robbed of our spiritual clothes and finally..we are left naked and embarrassed..both at our selves and in front of others..we quickly sew up fig leaves to cover our shame but the harm has already been done.. verse 9-11 give my humble conclusion to you Chris, “but when the Lord God called to the man, ‘where are you?’, he answered, ‘i heard you in the garden n i was afraid because i was naked; so i hid.’ and he said, ‘who told you that you were naked? have you eaten from the tree that i commanded you not to eat from?’ ” God Bless!!

Leave a Reply

Please fill in your name.

Name *

Please fill in your email address.

Mail (will not be published) *

Website

Please write a comment.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Notify me of new posts by email.