Slight correction: It is my desire to use the Bible as the place where I find my understanding of the role of women in marriage, period. Not “and men.”

Here is my point in the list. When I began to study the effects of feminism on the church, the very first thing I did was open my concordance and record every verse that refers to “woman, women, wife, and wives.” I went through and typed out every verse in order to get a full picture of what God Himself said regarding these. Woman and women alone took me over 55 pages.
In order to not send all 55+ pages, I removed all passages that used the terms only as a reference to a man (for example, wife of…, or “like a woman in childbirth”). I included all others. I did this specifically so that no one could claim issues of “context.” There is no context. It is simply a list of all verses that speak to or about women and wives.

You immediately followed your comment by pointing to men. This is so prevalent in society today. As I said in previous posts, my concentration has nothing to do with men. I want to know what God says to and about women. Let the men worry about the men. Men are not the focus when asking the question how women are to obey God; God’s Word to women is the focus.

You said it should be balanced. Why should it? Further, you said such balance should point out the “myriad of stories and comments made about the weaknesses of men.” Such a statement sounds for all the world like Adam and Eve shifting responsibility for their actions.

Why would God paint such a low picture of women?

First, because His Word is our manual for healing. We need to know where our potential follies lie in order to avoid them. Women DO have a tendency to be contentious. Case in point… you and I are contending over a point on which we both agree, namely women are commanded to submit to their husbands.

Second, The Word of God is and should be glorifying to God alone. It was never meant to build us up. It was meant to give us hope. That hope only comes in recognizing our own weakness and acknowledging that our only hope comes by accepting the free gift of forgiveness through Jesus’ death on the cross.

Part of the definition of the word glorify is “to give an accurate estimation of.” When we give an accurate estimation of ourselves, we see how accurate these verses are and how low we really are, which in turn gives an accurate estimation to our relationship to a perfectly holy God. And so, we get an accurate estimation of how awesome He truly is and how grateful we really should be that He deigned to offer us a way of salvation. We are loathsome. To deny it is to attempt to exalt ourselves closer to God.

You call this a “negative” view of women. I read the same verses in the same “context” and have no problem still believing that my God has value in me as a woman. He created women and He did it for reason and purpose. He said that He loved me enough to send His Son to die for me. I see no contradiction.

As a mother, I don’t feel that I do my children any favors by giving them a false sense of ability (notice I did not say VALUE – we seem to be ignoring that there is a difference). For example, I do not tell my daughter that she is the best artist ever in the entire world when it simply isn’t true. I encourage her to continue working at her skills through practice and perseverance. I also help her by telling her exactly what I expect from her and not leaving it to her interpretation of what she thinks I said. So did God.

You stated: “The passages in Ephesians tell us that the roles within marriage are a reflection of the relationship between Christ and the Church. Marriage becomes a visual aid for us to know how we relate to Jesus and how He relates to us. The verses you quoted from 1Corinthians 11 point out that the relationship between husband and wife was established at Creation, not as a consequence of the Fall, “For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man” (vs. 8). So pointing to the weaknesses of women as the reason for their submission misses the original purpose of that submission. “

Again, I included all verses in order to avoid context. I also made no comments regarding how to interpret the verses. Therefore, your statement at the end is not correct. I did not point out weaknesses, nor did I make any allegation of reason or purpose for the submission of wives.

“So we need to be careful that we do not feed that purpose of Satan by misusing the Bible to paint the wrong picture of why wives are to submit, and God’s view of women.” I did no such thing. I simply quoted the Word of God, you drew your own conclusion.

Yes, “God values women as much as He values men and He did not call women to be submissive to their husband’s because of their weaknesses but because of their nature as a helper which was the purpose for which He created them.” Again, we are contending over an issue upon which we agree.

The only point you have made on which we disagree is the “balance” required of pointing out what God says to and about men. To which I respond by pointing to the passage in John 21 where Paul asks Jesus, “But what about John…” Jesus tells him, “what is that to you? [What concern is it of yours?] You follow Me!” (verse 22 AMP).

Not only do we have the relationship between Christ and the Church as a model but we have the relationship amongst the Trinity also as a model. The three persons of the Trinity (God the Father, God the Son – Jesus, and God the Holy Spirit) are all equal but they have different roles and functions of those roles. God the Father is the head because His role is to initiate and delegate authority. God the Son – Jesus carries out the will of the Father. God the Holy Spirit empowers the work of the Son. So in Creation God the Father spoke, Jesus created through the empowerment of the Spirit. In Salvation God the Father sent the Son who accomplished the work by His death on the cross which is then completed in us through the power of the Holy Spirit. Paul writes in 1Corinthians 11:3, “Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.” The connection between the relationship between God the Father and the Son is reflected in the relationship between a husband and wife. I believe that one of the reasons that the family is under such severe attack today is because Satan wants to destroy that visual aid of the nature of God and the relationship between Christ and the Church.

So we need to be careful that we do not feed that purpose of Satan by misusing the Bible to paint the wrong picture of why wives are to submit, and God’s view of women. God values women as much as He values men and He did not call women to be submissive to their husband’s because of their weaknesses but because of their nature as a helper which was the purpose for which He created them.

Gen 3:15, 16 – …And he will RULE over you.

Gen 24:8 – And if the woman should not be willing to go along after you, then you will be clear from this oath; only you must not take my son back there. (note: she was given a choice – speaks to volitional submission)

De 28:56 – The most tender and daintily bred woman among you, who would not venture to set the sole of her foot upon the ground because she is so dainty and kind, will grudge the husband of her bosom to her son and to her daughter

Prov 9:13 – The foolish woman is noisy; she is simple and open to all forms of evil she [willfully and recklessly] knows nothing whatever [of eternal value].

Prov 11:16 – A gracious and good woman wins honor [for her husband], and violent men win riches but a woman who hates righteousness is a throne of dishonor for him.

Prov 11:22 – As a ring of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a fair woman who is without discretion.

Prov 12:4 – A virtuous and worthy wife [earnest and strong in character] is a crowning joy to her husband, but she who makes him ashamed is as rottenness in his bones.

Prov 14:1 – Every wise woman builds her house, but the foolish one tears it down with her own hands.

Prov 21:9 – It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop [on the flat oriental roof, exposed to all kinds of weather] than in a house shared with a nagging, quarrelsome, and faultfinding woman.

Prov 21:19 – It is better to dwell in a desert land than with a contentious woman and with vexation.

Prov 22:14 – The mouth of a loose woman is a deep pit [for ensnaring wild animals]; he with whom the Lord is indignant and who is abhorrent to Him will fall into it.

Prov 25:24 – It is better to dwell in the corner of the housetop than to share a house with a disagreeing, quarrelsome, and scolding woman.

Prov 27:15-16 – A continual dripping on a day of violent showers and a contentious woman are alike. Whoever attempts to restrain [a contentious woman] might as well try to stop the wind – his right hand encounters oil and she slips through his fingers.

Prov 31:30 – Charm and grace are deceptive, and beauty is vain [because it is not lasting], but a woman who reverently and worshipfully fears the Lord, she shall be praised.

Ecc 7:26 – And I found that [of all sinful follies none has been so ruinous in seducing one away from God as idolatrous women] more bitter than death is the woman whose heart is snares and nets and whose hands are bands. Who ever pleases God shall escape from her, but the sinner shall be taken by her.

Ecc 7:28 – Which I am still seeking but have not found – one upright man among a thousand I have found, but an upright woman among all those [one thousand in my harem] have I not found.

Isa 3:12 – As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O My people, your leaders cause you to err, and they confuse (destroy and swallow up) the course of your paths. (note: a woman ruling over them was a punishment from God)

1 Corinthians 7:2-4 – But because of the temptation to impurity and to avoid immorality, let each [man] have his own wife and let each [woman] have her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights (goodwill, kindness, and what is due her as his wife), and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have [exclusive] authority and control over her own body, but the husband [has his rights]; likewise also the husband does not have [exclusive] authority and control over his body, but the wife [has her rights].
1 Cor 11:3 – But I want you to know and realize that Christ is the Head of every man, the head of a woman is her husband and the Head of Christ is God.

1 Cor 11:5-16 – And any woman who [publicly] prays or prophesies (teaches, refutes, reproves, admonishes, or comforts) when she is bareheaded dishonors her head (her husband); it is the same as [if her head were shaved]. For if a woman will not wear [a head] covering, then she should cut off her hair too; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her head shorn or shaven let her cover [her head]. For a man ought not to wear anything on his head [in church], for he is the image and [reflected] glory of God [his function of government reflects the majesty of divine Rule]; but woman is [the expression of] man’s glory (majesty, preeminence). [Gen 1:26] For man was not [created] from woman, but woman from man; [Gen 2:21-23] Neither was man created on account of or for the benefit of woman, but woman on account of and for the benefit of man. [Gen 2:18] Therefore she should [be subject to his authority and should] have a covering on her head [as a token, a symbol, of her submission to authority, that she may show reverence as do] the angels [and not displease them]. Nevertheless, in [the plan of] the Lord and from His point of view woman is not apart from and independent of man, nor is man aloof from and independent of woman; For as woman was made from man, even so man is also born of woman; and all [whether male of female go forth] from God [as their author]. Consider for yourselves; is it proper and decent [according to your customs] for a woman to offer prayer to God [publicly] with her head uncovered? Does not the native sense of propriety (experience, common sense, reason) itself teach you that for a man to wear long hair is a dishonor [humiliating and degrading] to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her ornament and glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering. Now if anyone is disposed to be argumentative and contentious about this, we hold to and recognize no other custom [in worship] than this, nor do the churches of God generally.

1 Cor 14:34,35 – The women should keep quiet in the churches, for they are not authorized to speak, but should take a secondary and subordinate place, just as the Law also says. [Gen 3:16] But if there is anything they want to learn, they should ask their own husbands at home, for it is disgraceful for a woman to talk in church [for her to usurp and exercise authority over men in the church].

Eph 5:33 – However, let each man of you [without exception] love his wife as [being in a sense] his very own self; and let the wife see that she respects and reverences her husband [that she notices him, regards him, honors him, prefers him, venerates, and esteems him; and that she defers to him, praises him, and loves and admires him exceedingly]. [I Pet. 3:2.]

1 Tim 2:9,10 – Also [I desire] that women should adorn themselves modestly and appropriately and sensibly in seemly apparel, not with [elaborate] hair arrangement or gold or pearls or expensive clothing, But by doing good deeds (deeds in themselves good and for the good and advantage of those contacted by them), as befits women who profess reverential fear for and devotion to God.

1 Tim 2:11,12 – Let a woman learn in quietness, in entire submissiveness. I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to remain in quietness and keep silence [in religious assemblies].

1 Tim 2:14 – And it was not Adam who was deceived, but [the] woman who was deluded and fell into transgression. [Gen 3:1-6]

1 Tim 5:2 – [Treat] older women like mothers [and] younger women like sisters, in all purity.

1 Tim 5:14 – So I would have younger [widows] marry, bear children, guide the household, [and] not give opponents of the faith occasion for slander or reproach.

2 Tim 3:6 – For among them are those who worm their way into homes and captivate silly and weak-natured and spiritually dwarfed women, loaded down with [the burden of their] sins [and easily] swayed and led away by various evil desires and seductive impulses.

Titus 2:3,4 – Bid the older women similarly to be reverent and devout in their deportment as becomes those engaged in sacred service, not slanderers or slaves to drink. They are to give good counsel and be teachers of what is right and noble, So that they will wisely train the young women to be sane and sober of mind (temperate, disciplined) and to love their husbands and their children, To be self-controlled, chaste, homemakers, good-natured (kind-hearted), adapting and subordinating themselves to their husbands, that the word of God may not be exposed to reproach (blasphemed or discredited).

1 Pet 3:5 – For it was thus that the pious women of old who hoped in God were [accustomed] to beautify themselves and were submissive to their husbands [adapting themselves to them as themselves secondary and dependent upon them].

I have a hard time accepting the definitions that you suggest for the word we translate ‘submit’. Even if we ignore the fact that the verb ‘hupotasso’ is used in classical Greek to talk about soldiers under a commander, the context of this word is pretty clear. “Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body.” (Ephesians 5:22-23) Just as Jesus is the head of the Church, so the husband is head of the wife. That is clearly referring to authority. But just as Jesus demonstrated His authority being a servant-leadership, so a husband is to serve the needs of his wife. “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her” (Ephesians 5:25) But just because Jesus gave His life for the Church and served His disciples by taking on the humiliating task of washing their feet, never once should we assume that He is not the final authority in all things pertaining to the Church. Husbands should give up their lives for their wives and sacrifice their own needs for that of their family, serving them in everything, but that does not take away from their role as the final authority for everything pertaining to the family (actually God is the final authority but you know what I mean.)

I also object to the characterization that Jesus as a child chose when he would or would not submit to His parents. His decision to be in the Temple listening and asking questions of the religious leaders was not an act of rebellion against His parents. It was an act of obedience to His heavenly Father. Submission is not volitional, as you suggest, but it is directed by God. As you can see from the conversation below that I have been having with Cindy, I understand submission to include a wife helping her husband when he is drifting away from what is right. That is not non-submission (sorry for the double negative) because it is done in love and respect under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. But that does not weaken the position of the husband as the head nor does it relegate submission to something wives can take or leave as it suits them.

And while I am at it, can I clarify that when God told Abraham to listen to what Sarah was telling him He was addressing a specific issue: that Abraham’s son Ishmael (the one born to Hagar, Sarah’s maidservant, whom Sarah had given to Abraham so that they might have an heir) would not take Isaac’s (the son born to Abraham and Sarah as a result of the promise of God) inheritance. God was not reversing the authority structure of the family but affirming that Sarah was right; God intended that Isaac would be the recipient of the promise He had given to Abraham. I think it is wise for a husband to listen to his wife. God has created her to see life differently and she has insights that a man needs to take into consideration when he makes decisions about his family.

So Michele, how do you understand the language of ‘headship’ in the Ephesians passage?

Not only are these connections between the abuse of women and the Bible important issues, the other painful reality is that the church, and perhaps in particular the evangelical movement within the church, has been embarrassingly and wrongfully silent on these issues.  One fears that most of the silence is the consequence of patriarchy and androcentrism, if not misogyny, in human history and within the church.  It would appear that the silence has been significantly broken only in our modem period with the empowerment of women to speak for themselves. 

As far as Sarah referring to Abraham as lord, I believe that was already explained. Historically speaking it was a term of respect, affection, or lordship depending upon the use of the word. Let’s not forget that God also told Abraham to obey Sarah. God is not on the side of gender, neither sees gender, but on the side of right.

According to Dr. Katherine Bushnell, the noun “subjection” is not found (in classical Greek), outside of the New Testament.(1) This term, therefore, was coined to describe relationships peculiar to believers.  Upon careful analysis, we can see that the true sense of the word describes the Christian grace of voluntarily yielding one’s preferences to another.  Traditional principles are not involved, nor is the assertion of one’s individual rights.

Schleusner’s Greek-Latin Lexicon to the Septuagint declares that the verb form, “to submit,” does not always convey the thought of servile subjection.  For example, Jesus, as a boy, was subject to His parents, yet we know that He did not even consult them when He was “about His Father’s business.” (Luke 2:49,51).  From this account, one can clearly see that to be in submission is volitional and open to one’s individual discernment.

Finally, submission does not mean “to obey.” The Greek word for “obey/obedience” is hupakoe, which means to listen to or to harken to.  Submission (hupotasso) means to get under and lift up, or to put in order.  It does not mean obedience.  Gundry well defines this equalizing principle as a sort of voluntary raising everyone else to your own personal level of importance and worthiness.(2) It is interesting to note that other languages further reinforce this concept.  For example, Kluane Spake, writes, “The German translation of that word, sich unterstellen, means to place oneself at a disposition of another.”  It can also be a military term referring to the equal sharing of tasks, to support, to fulfill one’s part of the assignment.” (3)

I agree that Abigail did act in a humble submissive way, but that did not stop her from communicating her concern with the wrong action of her husband Nabal and David. I think her example is a good one for women to follow of what submission looks like. It is not ‘nagging’ which has a completely different attitude and motivation. Submissive correction comes out of a motivation to help the offender and in love draw him back towards God’s path. I think that is why the language of submission and subjection and humility is so prevalent in the biblical passages that deal with the relationships. Christians are to be subject to the ruling authorities, young men are called to submit to the wisdom of elders, pastors are called to exercise authority with all humility. Wives can be submissive to their husbands and still obey God’s instruction to “admonish the unruly, encourage the fainthearted, help the weak, be patient with everyone.” (1Thessalonians 4:14) and “Let the word of Christ richly dwell within you, with all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another” (Colossians 3:16) and “Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness” (Galatians 6:1). We are not called to be the Holy Spirit but we are called to help guard one another from sin. In order to accomplish that we need to be completely dependent on the leading of the Holy Spirit and as He leads us, we need to be obedient and act.

No we know in this life none of us is free from the influences of our sinful nature and are prone to acting in rebellion against God. So we need to be sure that when we are correcting someone that we are indeed being led by the Spirit. That is why Paul follows up Galatians 6:1 with “Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted.” It is so easy to lose our focus on loving the offender and getting proud and selfish.

But that also is important because we realize that even if we have chosen the one we marry well, they are not immune to poor choices and developing patterns of sin. If a husband has his judgement clouded by sin in his life, his believing wife has to seriously ask how the Holy Spirit would use her to help him return to a right relationship with God. That does not mean she becomes the head of the home even for a short time, but she can be led by the Spirit to help correct her husband in a loving and humble way. She has not become any less submissive just as Peter was not unsubmissive to the ruling authorities but followed the leading of the Holy Spirit to play a part in helping them see the sinfulness of their actions and attitudes.

In reference to Jesus’ direction for dealing with conflict I don’t think “brother” is a qualifier that Jesus is using to determine who you do and do not follow these steps through with. “Brother” is usually used as a generic term implying a person that you have relationship with. Often it is used to talk about fellow believers but is not just referring to a peer group. This is a pattern that is to be followed no matter who the person is. Even the use of the ekklesia which is often translated ‘church’ is a Greek term that means ‘gathered ones’ and was used to describe a civic gathering as much as a religious gathering. Remember, at this point there was no ‘church’ yet; that happened after Pentecost. Those who heard Jesus say this likely thought of the synagogue or community gathering not a Christian church. I think that this pattern described by Jesus is the best way of dealing with any conflict, even that between a husband and wife.

I would disagree with you that the context of Ephesians 4:15 starts in verse 13. I think a better place to go for the overall context of this passage is verse 1-3 “Therefore I, the prisoner of the Lord, implore you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling with which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, showing tolerance for one another in love, being diligent to preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” That theme is carried on right through to the end of the chapter with “Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you.” (vs 31-32) It is then carried on into the discussion of chapter 5 as it talks about walking in love, being subject to one another in the fear of Christ, which leads to the relationships within the Christian home. This whole section is about life together and how we preserve the unity of the Spirit and the bond of peace. We do not preserve the bond of peace and the unity of the Spirit by ignoring sin in one another but by humbly, in love, working through the differences that are there. We allow the Word of God to enrich our discussions and depend on the Holy Spirit to direct our decisions. Yes it is directed to the Christian community but that also includes husbands and wives. There is a richness to our marriages when we function as the Body of Christ, each one using the gifts that He has given in order to build up the whole Body. Wives can do that without losing their submission to their husbands.

As in all things, the Holy Spirit needs to be the guide for wives and husbands. There are different ways to lead in different situations and with different people. Some leaders are very autocratic and there are situations where that works well. Other leaders are more consensus driven and that also works well in certain situations. A wife can help her husband find a leadership style that works well for his personality and for the situation that their home is in. I believe that the Holy Spirit does a great job of helping us through those family dynamics and helps each of us understand what our role is. He uses the Bible to help guide our understanding of His leading because He will not lead us in a way that is contrary to what He has said there.

To begin, you state regarding Abraham asking Sarah to lie about being married, “Perhaps a loving word of warning from Sarah could have prevented some harmful situations…” Perhaps so, but we will never know for sure. What we do know instead is that Sarah obeyed her husband without arguing, and God intervened for them thereby giving the glory to God rather than Sarah. We also know Sarah is commended in the New Testament for being submissive to and calling Abraham “Master.” The same verses (1 Peter 3:5-6), state that we are her daughters if we do not succumb to fear and anxiety, possibly suggesting by context there were times in her life when Sarah could have succumbed but did not. Rather, she stayed submissive even in the face of fear. I will concede, however, this interpretation requires reading into the passage.

Much like the examples of Abraham lying about his relation to Sarah, we do not know what “might have been” in the story of Abigail had she chosen to submit to Nabal. It is entirely possible God may have intervened for her and her household as well, but we will never know because she took action instead of standing in faith that He would. However, we are told in the Word that Abigail is intelligent and she is praised for her action.

What is interesting to me in this passage is not only THAT she acted, but HOW she acted.

First, the biblical account (Amplified) specifies “she came down hidden by the mountain.” She did not meet him out in the open in front of everyone. Her purpose may have been two-fold; first, to protect David’s reputation as meeting him this way would have given him a way out of the situation while allowing him to “save face” in front of his men, and second, to show reverence to her husband as she was going to disobey him but she opted not to do it publicly. David commends her for her discretion.

Second, Abigail immediately bows to David and requests that he count the guilt of the indiscretion of her husband as her own. Hers is a posture of submission to his authority. As well, when David asks to marry her after Nabal’s death, she responds again in submission, declaring she would be content to be a servant to him and to his servants. She is clearly a woman who has established a pattern of godly submission throughout her life. I submit that what David recognized and valued in her was her willing submission and her willingness to guard the reputation of her husband even when he did not deserve it.

You cited Acts 4:19-20, which questions whether to obey God or men. This example speaks to the very heart of the importance of choosing one’s mate carefully. If one is careful in the selection of their husband, one should not have to choose between obeying husband versus obeying God. If you marry a man who has yielded his life to the Lord, you theoretically should never be in a position of receiving instruction opposed to God. Once again however, the command to women in 1 Peter 3:1 specifically refers to a wife who is married to a man who is not obeying God. Her instruction is to submit to her husband, and so if she submits to him she is being obedient to the Lord.

Your example of Matthew 18:15-17 assumes three things. First, it assumes equal status (“If your brother…”). Second, it assumes he has sinned. And third, it assumes the sin is against you. If we are honest with ourselves, we will admit there are only rare examples of the occurrence of all three together within our relationships. As women we are far more likely to “show him his fault” about far more things than actually fit these criteria.

Regarding Ephesians 4:15, this appears to be a contextual interpretation issue. Having read verses 13-17 in various versions, it seems to me Paul is talking about expressing the truth of THE GOSPEL in love so that we and fellow believers are not continually misled by contradictory teachings. Paul is giving us another command to exhort one another. I believe it was Beth Moore who pointed out that almost all uses of “exhort” in the Bible are used in a fellowship context, and indeed it seems this passage is as well. It was directed to the church corporate, not to individual couples.

You said that part of Eve’s role is to “help point out things that a man will miss.” It is interesting to me that the Lord took the time to spell out for us in such detail what he requires from a wife that He devoted an entire chapter (Proverbs 31) to it along with various other scriptures throughout the Bible, and yet He never once commands us to “point out” anything to our husbands. Rather, again, He commands us far more often to be in quiet submission. Even in your example from Ecclesiastes, the context if applied to the marriage relationship is “when one falls” the other can help him up, not “follow him around and keep warning him when it looks as though he might fall.”

Finally, you state, “It is a wise husband who not only listens to his wife’s perspective, but invites her opinions…” A wife who learns to keep quiet is far more likely to earn the respect of her husband than one who makes a habit of offering her opinion, which men view as “nagging.” Once his respect has been earned, a man will certainly seek out his wife’s advice, especially if he is certain she will not castigate him if he does not take her advice. As well, we once again have reverted to pointing to the man and what he should or should not be doing rather than keeping our focus on what we ourselves should or should not do. The function of the Holy Spirit is to give counsel and point out truth and convict of sin. We are never called to be his Holy Spirit.