God and the Big Bang: In the Beginning

Many people think that science and faith tell conflicting stories about how the universe began. But they might not be as different as you think. Scientists speak of a definite moment of creation in a vast cosmic explosion (the ‘Big Bang’), which had to be carefully adjusted for human life to be possible. Far from conflicting, the scientific picture may point us towards a supernatural creator God.  What really happened back in the beginning? This is the first of a eight-part video series exploring how cosmic fine-tuning points towards the reality of a creator God.

God and the Big Bang series

1. In the Beginning: Do science and faith agree about how the universe began?
2. The Evidence: Does evidence of a Creator exist?
3. Science and Faith: Are science and faith really in conflict?
4. Dark Matters: How did we get here?
5. Unsolved Mysteries: What do we do with the unexplainable?
6. Christians and the Big Bang: Can Christians believe in both a Creator God and the Big Bang?
7. The Contributors: Listen to Christian scientists who believe in the Big Bang
8. How Old is the Universe?

Watch the next video: The Evidence

Take the next step:
Finding truth in the stars
What science can’t explain
What is God like? Try our online study to find out more

One Response to “God and the Big Bang: In the Beginning”

• Loading comments
• Marie Gronley MD says:

  January 19, 2012 at 7:03 pm

  Scientific discoveries seem to point to a beginning of the universe and a designer. Unfortunately most don’t realize that all physicists have to begin their theories based on their presuppositions and worldviews. They also declare things to be true on pain of convention; therefore, their findings, evidences they include or exclude will be based on their biases. There are no brute facts to observe in the universe especially when dealing with the past and the origins. Their theories take as much faith as do many theological views. Knowledge is a justified true belief and religious theories are on par with scientific theories and NOT inferior to science. I would go one step further and say that a physicist is nothing more than a philosopher with a slide-rule.